General

Calculations of solar production on the roof of trailer pulled by a Tesla Semi

I'm sure this has been discussed in detail already, but due to lack of search functionality, I can't find threads on it, so here are my calculations. I'm sure everyone has thought about solar on a trailer producing energy while cruising down a highway and are wondering how beneficial it would be:

Let's use a 53ft typical trailer being pulled by the Tesla Semi:

Surface area on 53ft trailer roof:
41.81sq meters

Average annual solar potential (southwest US, source N.R.E.L.):
6kWh/sq meter per day

Efficiency of solar PV on the roof (23% currently possible)
6kWh x 23% = 1.38kWh/sq meter per day

Total average daily energy generation:
41.81sq meters x 1.38kWh/sq meter = 57.7kWh/day

Possible energy losses from shading, reflection, transmission to battery etc. (5%)
57.7 x 95% = 54.8kWh/day net energy generation
54.8kWh/day x 365 days = 20,000kWh/year or 20mWh/year

Fuel economy of an electric semi pulling a trailer:
0.6miles/kWh (based on efficiency of an electric motor over a diesel engine)

Free, "Solar powered" miles by a Tesla Semi pulling a 53ft solar PV equipped trailer:
0.6miles/kWh x 54.8kWh = 32.9 miles/day
32.9 miles/day x 365 days = 12,001 miles/year

-------------
Here are the same calculations for a a Triple Turnpike (3 53ft trailers).

Surface area is 125.4 sq meters = 164kWh/day energy generation, 59,860kWh/year

Assuming a fuel economy of 0.4 miles/kWh: free, "solar powered" miles by a Tesla Semi pulling a solar equipped triple turnpike:
65 miles/day or 23,944 miles/year

--------------

My fuel economy numbers are estimates, they could be more or less, but what is important to note is that solar on these trailer roofs will generate 57.7kWh/day (53ft trailer) and 164kWh/day (triple turnpike) of energy. In my opinion, solar on a trailer would be quite beneficial both in efficiency and cost savings.

A 53ft trailer can fit a 13.4kWh/solar array. Assuming the cost of $1.50/watt solar hardware and installation cost = $20,000 capital investment. The energy produced per year would offer savings of $3,600/year (based on $0.18/kWh grid price, California), offering payback in about 5.5 years.

I believe all these numbers are fairly conservative and should only get better with the cost of electricity going up, solar panel hardware going down, PV efficiency improving beyond 23% etc.

oh yeah: Weight of solar panels on a 53ft trailer? 10-20kg/sq meter = 418kg to 836kg (921lbs to 1,842lbs). Nothing to worry about there.

It'll be exciting to see what specs we get from Tesla this evening.

Comments

  • edited November 2017
    Can the PV cells handle the vibration, how about substantial reductions in efficiency due to not being aimed correctly?
  • edited November 2017
    23% efficient cells are too expensive. And 6 kWh per day is for terrestrial mount- perpendicular to sun. Divide by 2 for practical efficiency, multiply by square root of 2 for angle (assuming average sun angle about 45 degrees) and take off 20% to step voltage up.... your array is more like 20 kWh per day. Installed cost on a truck plus wiring and inverters comes extra. Plus, of course, trailers arent dedicated to tractors- they are switched around.
  • edited November 2017
    @ryanlogtenberg The other big loss you're not considering is when you use the full 6kwh per day solar amount with the full 23% yield. That is the direct amount with no angle losses. You know how solar panels on angles, work, right? The full ideal yield of 23% you quoted is if you have a solar tracking array that can keep the panels always facing exactly at the sun so that the solar rays are hitting the panel dead on perfectly perpendicular to the face of the panel.

    With a flat surface on top of a truck, there is only going to be about an hour at noon when it's directly overhead giving you that maximum yield, and it drops off pretty fast. It basically works like vector geometry, where if it's coming in at a 45% angle, it's only half the yield downward toward the panel, yielding half as much energy. Most of the day is obviously at angles like that, so it's less than 23% yield most of the time.
Sign In or Register to comment.