Forums

Can I put this generator in the trunk of a Tesla?

Can I put this generator in the trunk of a Tesla?

Motionless Electromagnetic Generator, US Patent 6362718.
Perhaps someone can sell it as a aftermarket add-on?
History: http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/103001.htm

Bettyfretz | April 25, 2015

It is not a product yet. This article is 14 years old and is about clearing the patent obstacles regarding this theory. Don't hold your breath.

Also, the topic of adding a generator to the Tesla has already been kicked around this forum in great depth.

science-isbetter | April 25, 2015

@ElaisaKasan:

Referring to your previous posts about a scooter that recharges itself without any external energy, this patent ('718) is different.

Are you posting it because you believe the '718 patent covers a device that creates more electrical energy than the total of energy put into it?

The article that you refer to ("Cheniere.org") was written before the '718 patent was issued...so I don't believe it casts new light on the patented "electromagnetic generator." However, the Cheniere.org article mischaracterizes the 1957 Nobel to Lee and Yang. Their work was about the breaking of symmetry in certain sub-atomic particle processes (Beta decay). It's way beyond the scope of this forum to describe even the context of sub-atomic particle symmetry but suffice it to say that it is not related to extracting more energy from a system than was put into it.

I briefly scanned the '718 patent and although its specification points out that previous generators require "a steady input of power" it doesn't quite say that the '718 does not. See '718 Column 3 lines 37 - 45.

I also briefly scanned the Claims of the '718 and I didn't see any claim related to creating more energy than was put it.

ElaisaKasan | April 26, 2015

Here is a similar 2kw product slated for Q415.

http://auroratek.us/PRODUCTS.html

vperl | April 26, 2015

Phoney issues, all smoke no real products.

Why continue this fraud ?

vperl | April 26, 2015

Where can one purchase the said item.today

Grinnin'.VA | April 26, 2015

@ vperl | April 26, 2015

Phoney issues, all smoke no real products.

I think you're right.

Why continue this fraud ?

Good question.

vperl | April 26, 2015

Like many of the topics, the topic are senseless, repetitive, and comical.

Read the Tesla site, download the owners manual read it.

Then 90% questions are answered.

The read the posts on the forum.

Thinking of starting topic " If all of L. A. Was twenty feet under water would anyone care or notice"

Timo | April 26, 2015

Because it is fraud, it is beneficial to continue it as long as money is pouring in and cops show no interest in the issue. That is why they continue it.

ElaisaKasan | April 27, 2015

Well, at least we both agree fraud is involved, even if we disagree about who is committing the fraud.

http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/050207.htm

http://www.cheniere.org/articles/EE%20briefing.htm

Timo | April 27, 2015

Of course there are also people with no clue about physics, delusional conspiracy theorists and gullible idiots involved. Those are the perfect victims for the fraud.

DTsea | April 27, 2015

The mere fact that maxwells equation describe every experiment accurately is a mere bagatelle to conspiracy theorists.

Sad.

ElaisaKasan | April 27, 2015

The truncated Maxwell's equations (currently used in EE) do not explain Broken Symmetry.

There are many instances where classical electromagnetic theory fails to predict the proper outcome of well known experiments.

For example:
http://vos.sdf-us.org/Networking/apoce.pdf

Brian H | April 27, 2015

EK, legend in his own mind. And nowhere else.

ElaisaKasan | April 27, 2015

The real heroes are people like Nicola Tesla, T. Thompson Brown, Tom Bearden, Troy Reed, John Searl, Bruce DePalma, Stanley Meyer, John Bedini, Peter Lindemann, Randell Mills, Roman Akula, William Alek, the proponents of The Disclosure Project and many, more.

Here are simple experiments any person can perform to understand the theory and see for themselves how this device works. The Pound Rebka experiment clearly shows direct evidence of this vacuum exchange of energy occurring in nature.

http://intalek.com/Index/Projects/Research/otto_ronette_TPU_ECD-V1_0.pdf

hpoe5 | April 27, 2015

ElaisaKasan
+1

Timo | April 28, 2015

At least write Tesla name correctly if you are going to make his look like a hero. He's the only real hero in that group.

vperl | April 28, 2015

EK. -69

Dramsey | April 29, 2015

Oh, for the love of God, ElaisaKasan: Steve Mark has been flogging his "ECD" scam since the 90s. You know, for decades.

And somehow we're still not driving around in self-powered vehicles using "over-unity energy".

A little internet research shows that Steven D. Marks has been fleecing gullible investors for many years. He gives a demo, but won't allow inspection of his device. He claims a few problems-- overheating, etc.-- can be solved with just a few million dollars more. Somehow, the problems are never solved.

How gullible-- how maddeningly, brain-dead ignorant and stupid-- would somehow have to be to believe in this crap? Even if you think "free energy" is real, the most cursory look at Steven Marks would make it painfully obvious he's a scammer.

I urge you to give him every penny you can spare.

Caio | October 16, 2019

"the topic of adding a generator to the Tesla has already been kicked around this forum in great depth"
Yeah, For example: https://forums.tesla.com/forum/forums/charging-generator-0

andy.connor.e | October 16, 2019

Why are you responding to a 4 year old thread as if this is still a discussion?

@Caio you are all over the forums today responding to old threads.

TeslaTap.com | October 16, 2019

It's very likely Caio is a bot trying to look legitimate before it starts really spamming big-time. You need some number of posts before you can include links.

Tesla2018 | October 21, 2019

I just flagged him and a bunch of other bots that are posting irrevelant links. Beware of pre earnings report fudsters.