Do the brake lights come on when slowing down using Regen braking? How do the cars behind you know you are quickly slowing down if the brake lights don't come on?
Short answer: Yes they do.
And one of the most comprehensive threads on regeneration in general:http://www.teslamotors.com/forum/forums/coasting-retarded-it-roadster
Yes, the brake lights come on during regen, just like the Roadster's did. It's a software response tied to accelerometers: the brake lights come on when the car decelerates, whether you push on the brake pedal or not.
They come in a lot. Drivers will think you love to brake, but then you'll leave them in the dust.
To get the most from playing with the minds of tailgaters, lift foot from the goose pedal for a few seconds, then floor it!
Yep. I got totaled July before last. Was in the decel lane on an exit and got plowed into at highway speed by a young girl borrowing her parents SUV to move.
Bought the truck back from the yard and still driving it (replacing the car at that time was not part of my Tesla master plan). Spent a lovley July Friday in an MRI machine and was treated for a concussion at the ER.
Next Friday, same exact spot. Light rain, 60 mph, Masarati 20 feet off my smashed in back end. I don't understand some people.
But I'll do the same thing. In an ice, you mash the brake and gas at the same time for an instant, then release the brake. You car appears to halt, then disappear from the space they just plowed through. Serves them right if they have to change trousers. What if it was a deer, or a dog, or a kid? Can they stop? Would they plow into me and cause me to run over the kid anyway?
Other than that, I try to ignore it. I just tip the rear mirror up, and out of sight out of mind. I lock the speedo just above the limit, and I'm not willing to get a ticket for some asshat. So, if they are behind, sucks to be them.
We used to have a line you could call for agressive driving. Closed due to budget. Would really like to have that line open once I get a rear camera....
Wanted to get a sticker for the back that said "The last tailgater made my Tesla downpayment", but I don't have much of a bumper left for a sticker.
I wonder if the brake lights lite up a bit too soon. In a video I saw about Model S it looked like they did light up before you actually regen, when speed was slowing just by lifting your feet a bit from the accelerator. They also "flicker" meaning that there is no threshold between light on lights off. I mean if you are just at the borderline of brake lights going on, you should be able to get "a bit less deceleration" before lights go off again.
I think brake lights should come up only when you actually hit the deceleration that is greater than coasting IE. you actually regen brake, not just slow down.
----------> deceleration increases
lights off lights on
d*mn. Lets try this with pre and H6
----------> deceleration increases
lights off lights on
Timo, with a due respect, I think it is extremely hard to judge these kinds of things from video, and until we have first hand experience, any debate or critique is pointless. Tesla has shown that they are not technologically naive, and I'm sure they have heard of a hysteresis before.
I obviously don't have any experience about Model S, but in the video I saw the lights "flicker", which means that either there is no "hysteresis" or that driver in front of the chase car had really restless accelerator foot. Or did rest his/her other foot onto brake pedal. Pressing that should obviously light up brake lights immediately. Anyway, it looked weird.
Or it's a video artifact because the frame rate of the video interferes with some properties of the light source. Do you really believe that the wheels slowly turn backwards when it looks like it on video?
Some newer cars have two stages of brake lights: The regular brake lights that come on during normal driving, and some kind of "super brake light" that indicates really hard braking. On a BMW, e.g., the "super brake light" quickly pulses to unmistakably warn drivers behind the car. I haven't heard of it but I wouldn't be surprised if Tesla had a similar feature. Maybe that's what you saw?
It wasn't steady flicker, and when the car actually brake lights were solid. If it were a video artifact then those lights should have flickered then too.
OTOH it could have been "prototype -issue", because IIRC it didn't light up entire back light area either, only the area that is in "bumper" not in the boot, and (again IIRC) people here have said that final product does light up entire back of the lights. It was video of one of those early "get amped" test drives if I remember correctly.
This should answer your question Timo: what is the trigger for the brake lights? I remember reading (although I forget where exactly) that the brake lights aren't triggered by regen kicking in, but by the cars accelerometers indicating deceleration. Depending on the components and levels used, there could be a 'neutral' speed that could trigger a flickering of the brake lights as you describe.
I'd actually prefer amber for regen, red for actual braking.
Brian H, I don't see any of your notorious smileys. You must be kidding.
@ Brian H
Agree on the Amber for regen, red for actual braking, or maybe when the brake pedal is applied, a rapid flashing of the red brake lights and then steady.
No car has amber brake lights at this time, so this will confuse drivers. Not a good plan.
Amber is only approved for turn signals, (required in EU) and I really wish TM had adopted amber turn signals worldwide, rather than red for the US.
The 'super brake lights' feature is not currently approved in the US. A test program allowed 5000 BMWs equipped with the 'super break lights' to be sold in the US. Perhaps the feature will soon be a recommendation if it proves to be effective. Personally, it seems like it has to be.
Teoatawki, thanks, that's interesting. I see them increasingly frequently around here in Germany. Naturally, they usually only come to use on the Autobahn, not around town, where speed usually is low enough not to trigger them even when stomping on the brakes. Going from 20 or even 30 mph to a stop usually isn't too dangerous, even when stopping suddenly.
It's a different story when coming down from 110 mph or more to 50 mph or less (e.g., due to a slow vehicle changing lanes, or a bottle neck), when there's someone behind you going at the same speed. It makes a huge difference at that speed, if the car in front just touches the brakes or strongly decelerates -- but without the "super brake lights" (my term, sorry, don't know any better) it often is extremely hard to tell the difference from behind -- your view may be obstructed by the terrain, or by the very car in front of you, so that it is impossible to tell the reason for the other car braking, even if you pay attention.
Bottom line: I think there's a huge pro, and I can't think of any cons. However, I also think they are most useful (and actually needed) at "stupid" German autobahn speeds. At speeds up to 80 mph, most vehicles go at approximately the same speed and these dangerous situations rarely happen at all. Which is one argument for a speed limit on German autobahns, but that's a different discussion... ;-)
"No car has amber brake lights at this time, so this will confuse drivers."
Yes, no amber brake lights but some metro buses have flashing amber (like your hazard/four way lights) or alternating amber lights to get your attention that they are slowing down, not accelerating.
Automatic brake lights were implemented in the early 1900's. Yes that early. The problem was that those incandescent tail lights were lighting up when parked in the garage. Result was a dead battery and an unhappy customer. As batteries were really expensive then, a federal law was passed that said the brake lights may only come on when the brake pedal is depressed.
100 years later, computer control and accelerometer sensor capabilities have improved. But has that law been rescinded, or is it just being ignored? ;) I'm OK either way.
It's still enforced in Europe.